sciencesloop.
中文
CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE FOR SCIENCEKNOWLEDGE / ANALYSIS / WORKFLOWS

From experiment data
to the next decision.

Connect a result to earlier work, examine competing explanations, and decide whether to search, analyze, discuss, or test. We explore focused, researcher-led workflows with your existing records and tools.

Find your starting point ↓Focused workflow pilots for materials and electrochemistry R&D. Scope and feasibility agreed with your team.
Conceptual materials research image of glass sample vessels in warm light
FROM ISOLATED PIECESTO A CONNECTED RESEARCH PICTURE.
Concept image
01Trace the evidence ↓02Compare experiments ↓03Keep the research thread ↓
01 — WHAT WE DO

When research gets stuck,
find the next question.

Choose where your team loses the thread: finding evidence, comparing results, or carrying a decision and its rationale into the next stage.

Find the evidence behind a result

A plot alone rarely tells the full story. Link a result to its sample, measurement conditions, lab notes, and source files so a researcher can check how it was produced.

Literature & reportsExperimental recordsSource-linked records
WHAT YOU WALK AWAY WITH

A searchable set of selected results, with links to the original records and the context available for each one.

Explore a focused pilot ↗
SCIENTIFIC WORK, CONNECTED
Experiment filesMeasurements + conditions
Papers & reportsFindings + references
Team knowledgeMethods + observations
CONNECTED CONTEXT

Electrolyte
research

SamplesConditionsResults
✓ Links to original records
Find the work. Understand the context. Build on it.
Service illustrationNot a live system or customer dataset

Compare conditions before explaining a difference

Put two runs side by side. Check sample identity, formulation, settings, and missing records before deciding which difference deserves another test.

Data comparisonScientific contextFollow-up planning
WHAT YOU WALK AWAY WITH

A conditions comparison, missing-information checklist, and proposed next steps for researcher review.

Explore a focused pilot ↗
SCIENTIFIC WORK, CONNECTED
COMPARE BEFORE YOU CONCLUDE
Illustrative experiment conditions
Experiment contextRun ARun B
Active materialSameSame
SolventDMSODMSO
Supporting saltLiTFSINaTFSI
A DIFFERENCE TO INVESTIGATE

What else changed with the supporting salt?

Before interpreting the difference

Match sample IDs to the original records. Check salt concentration and test temperature; flag anything missing before proposing a follow-up.

A useful question—not an unsupported conclusion.
Service illustrationNot a live system or customer dataset

Keep decisions and evidence connected

Connect an instrument result with its sources, analysis, alternative explanations, decision rationale, and researcher review so the inquiry can be revisited and advanced.

Existing toolsWorkflow integrationTeam collaboration
WHAT YOU WALK AWAY WITH

A scoped pilot showing a result, its evidence and alternatives, and a proposed action for researcher review.

Explore a focused pilot ↗
SCIENTIFIC WORK, CONNECTED
YOUR EXISTING LAB. A MORE CONNECTED WAY TO WORK.
01

Lab data

Instrument exports and research records

02

Analysis

Your methods, connected to inputs

03

Shared findings

Results ready for your team to review

Less copying between systemsMore continuity between steps
Start with one workflow. Keep what already works.
Service illustrationNot a live system or customer dataset
02 — HOW WE WORK

Start with your science.
Build around your reality.

You don’t need to replace your lab to explore what AI can do for it. Start with a defined problem, the resources you already have, and a result you can evaluate.

SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION

Explore Lu Zhang’s public research record in electrochemical energy storage. This is prior scientific work, not evidence of a customer deployment.

Focused pilots · Agreed scope · Researcher-led decisions
01Find the right starting point
We map one research bottleneck: what your team is trying to decide, where information gets lost, and which data and tools are available. Together, we define a useful first outcome.
02Connect a focused workflow
We agree on a bounded pilot around selected records, analysis tools, and review steps. Integration and feasibility are assessed for your setup.
03Evaluate before expanding
Agree on checks such as source traceability, researcher-reviewed comparisons, and manual handoffs relative to your current workflow. Review the results and limitations before deciding whether to expand.
THE NEXT STEP

Bring us the problem
you keep working around.

One workflow. One research bottleneck. Let’s explore what a useful pilot could look like.

Discuss your research workflow ↗

Start with a non-confidential summary of the bottleneck and tools involved. No research data needed for the first conversation.