<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SciencesLoop Writing</title>
    <link>https://sciencesloop.com/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://sciencesloop.com/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Short notes on AI for Science, scientific agents, RAG, evaluation, MLOps, and battery materials discovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:35:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>PaperQA2 is a useful reminder for scientific RAG: leave an evidence trail</title>
      <link>https://sciencesloop.com/blog/2026-06-15-future-house-paper-qa/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sciencesloop.com/blog/2026-06-15-future-house-paper-qa/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A SciencesLoop technical note on PaperQA2, citation precision, and reviewable scientific RAG artifacts.</description>
      <category>AI for Science</category>
      <category>SciencesLoop</category>
      <category>technical note</category>
      <category>RAG</category>
      <category>scientific agents</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ChemGraph is a better first test for scientific agents</title>
      <link>https://sciencesloop.com/blog/2026-06-13-chemgraph-scientific-agent-test/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sciencesloop.com/blog/2026-06-13-chemgraph-scientific-agent-test/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A SciencesLoop note on ChemGraph, computational chemistry agents, and why traceable workflows matter more than fluent chat.</description>
      <category>AI for Science</category>
      <category>chemistry agents</category>
      <category>scientific workflow</category>
      <category>evaluation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agentic Scientific Workflows: From Search to Traceable Decisions</title>
      <link>https://sciencesloop.com/blog/agentic-scientific-workflows/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sciencesloop.com/blog/agentic-scientific-workflows/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A working model for scientific agents that retrieve evidence, plan the next step, preserve uncertainty, and leave a decision trail.</description>
      <category>AI agents</category>
      <category>scientific workflow</category>
      <category>RAG</category>
      <category>evaluation</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Public-Safe Site Agent as a Portfolio Interface</title>
      <link>https://sciencesloop.com/blog/public-safe-site-agent/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sciencesloop.com/blog/public-safe-site-agent/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Why a personal technical site can be more useful when the homepage becomes a small, cited, public-safe agent.</description>
      <category>site agent</category>
      <category>portfolio</category>
      <category>public-safe AI</category>
      <category>SciencesLoop</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scientific RAG Needs Evaluation Before Confidence</title>
      <link>https://sciencesloop.com/blog/scientific-rag-needs-evaluation/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://sciencesloop.com/blog/scientific-rag-needs-evaluation/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>RAG systems for technical work should be judged by retrieval quality, citation faithfulness, and decision usefulness, not only fluent answers.</description>
      <category>RAG</category>
      <category>evaluation</category>
      <category>AI for Science</category>
      <category>evidence</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
